SITTWE, Myanmar — It has become harder to get lost. Global positioning systems are dogged stalkers. Yet being lost is a necessary condition.
In order to be immersed in place you have to let go of bearings, of time itself. Only then will mysteries begin to reveal themselves.
To every voyage there is a farthest point. It involves a feeling, an inflection, more than a location. V.S. Naipaul wrote of the “enigma of arrival.” That’s close.
One early morning, here in the capital of Myanmar’s troubled Rakhine State, I went for a walk along the seafront. Stray dogs accompanied me. The muddy waters of the Bay of Bengal lapped onto a beach where ranks of plastic chairs were set beneath lurching parasols.
A young man in longyi and camouflage jacket scattered crumbs to grimy gulls. A vast naval barracks had an air of abandonment. Faces seemed ravaged.
Long plunder, I thought, yielded this desolation. The British plundered Rakhine when it was part of imperial India. In his novel, “Burmese Days,” Orwell writes: “The Indian Empire is a despotism – benevolent, no doubt, but still a despotism with theft as its final object.” Dark-skinned people were disposable means to this end.
Before the British, the Burmese monarchy plundered the kingdom of Arakan, modern-day Rakhine. Had I not seen in Mandalay the Mahamuni Buddha, taken from Rakhine as a spoil of war, and now an object of Pagoda-gilding veneration?
Yes, in Mandalay, a crowd murmured in prayer, edging closer to the Buddha image. A child lay asleep on a mat oblivious to the flies. Market stalls nearby offered dahs, Burmese knives like small sickles. The palm-readers, weary of prophecy, had passed out after lunch.
After the British, the Burmese military pursued plunder of their own: crony business deals; the plundering of history to produce enemies that might justify its predations; the plundering of truth in an attempt to cover up the villages destroyed, the thousands slaughtered in a succession of wars against Myanmar’s ethnic minorities and dissidents.
Rakhine was always a suspect place. Like other minorities — the Kachin or the Shan — the Rakhine had a history that had to be bent, through force if necessary, to Burmese nationhood. The smiling images of Myanmar’s 135 official ethnic minorities (they do not include the Rohingya) in the National Museum in Yangon constitute folkloric deception.
In her book “Finding George Orwell in Burma,” Emma Larkin speaks to a historian, Tin Tin Lay, who says of the military: “They are interested only in nationalism and patriotism. There is no history in Burma any more. You can look in the school books and the libraries. You will not find it. We are a country without a history – without a truthful history.”
The destruction of the distinction between truth and falsehood is the foundation of dictatorship.
The military rampage against the Muslim Rohingya population of Rakhine State that sent more than 600,000 human beings across the Bangladeshi border was not an anomaly. It was of a piece with the plunder and lies of a half-century of military rule. Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, the embodiment of Myanmar’s democratic quest, is trying to wrest her country from the claws of the army, but also from untruth, opacity and fear. That is generational work.
Burmese nationalism has increasingly been wrapped in defiant Buddhism. Pope Francis met this week with Sitagu Sayadaw, one of Myanmar’s most revered senior monks. Sitagu Sayadaw recently gave a sermon at an army combat training school. He alluded to a historical battle between Buddhists and Tamils. After the battle, the story goes, the Buddhist king was troubled because many thousands of Tamils were dead.
The monks reassured him by saying that all the Tamils killed amounted to just one-and-a-half human beings, because only those keeping Buddhist precepts were human. Sitagu Sayadaw said the king, like the army today, was fighting for the security of Buddhism.
The Rohingya, for Myanmar’s Buddhist majority, are an invented identity, less than human, agents of a subterfuge to Islamize and seize territory.
No democracy can be built on denial of a people’s existence.
I drove out of Mandalay, through Sagaing with its countless golden bell-shaped pagodas, to a village on the Irrawaddy River to hear Sitagu Sayadaw speak. People pressed donations into the hands of organizers. Their names, and contributions, were announced over booming loudspeakers. The multi-colored Buddhist flag fluttered.
Sitagu Sayadaw entered in magenta robe under two white umbrellas. He said he was weary. His sermon was restrained.
I got talking to Daw Kyaing, aged 65, a woman with a lovely smile. I asked her why there were more women than men attending.
“Because only the women want to go to heaven. The men are busy drinking.”
“Where will the men go?
“To hell.”
“What do you want to be in in your next life?”
“I don’t want to come back in any form.”
“One life is enough?”
“More than enough.”
“You wouldn’t want to come back as a man?”
“No. I don’t want to drink. My husband was violent. We had 11 children. Now he can’t drink, so he doesn’t beat me anymore. I live with him, and grow rice, on a bend in the peaceful river.”
<
ROGER COHEN>
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x